Near enough to heal, strong enough to save
May 30, 2007
What question could a kind, gentle American seminary professor ask to get himself run
out of the famous Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem? Let me suggest you to take few minutes to read a short piece by Dr. Reggie Kidd, Professor of New Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando, entitled ‘The Deity of Jesus–So What?’ , and you will find more than an interesting encounter with Islam, but a rich discussion of the beauty, sweetness and necessity of eternal God taking on human flesh. Dr. Kidd (he would prefer you call him Reggie–with a hard ‘g’) reflects on the question, ‘What difference does it make that Jesus is not just man (though certainly that), but also God?’ Or to personalize the question a bit: ‘What has Jesus done for us that no human could do?’
John Owen and Pentecost
May 29, 2007
This past Lord’s Day was Pentecost Sunday, the occasion of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in fulfillment of the promise of Joel 2:28-32 (“I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh…”). In the Old Testament Pentecost was a feast that celebrated the first fruits of the year’s harvest (Exodus 23:16; Numbers 28:26). In the New Testament, the fulfillment appears, and the long-expected Day of the Lord has arrived: the powers of the age to come are released; the harvest of the world begins to come in. Christ—crucified, risen and ascended—pours out the Spirit in unrestrained measure and without geographical or ethnic limitation. The gospel promise “is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself” (Acts 2:39).
John Owen wrote Pneumatalogia, or A Discourse concerning the Holy Spirit in 1674. It
is a massive work occupying 650 pages in the Banner of Truth edition of Owen’s works (volume 3). Volume 4 contains a number of other works by Owen on the doctrine of the Holy Spirit. The Banner of Truth Trust has also released an abridged and modernized version, edited by R.J.K. Law, in their ‘Puritan Paperback Series’ entitled The Holy Spirit, to make Owen’s monumental work a bit more accessible to contemporary readers. The Sweet Dropper, who has read and outlined the entirety of the originals in volumes 3 and 4, highly recommends the paperback.
Here is a good taste of the abridged version, which I read during Evening Worship:
The great privilege prophesied of the gospel age, which would make the New Testament church more glorious than that of the Old, was the wonderful pouring out of the promised Holy Spirit on all believers. This was the good wine which was kept to the last (Isa. 35:7; 44:3; Joel 2:28; Ezek. 11:19; 36:27).
The ministry of the gospel by which we are born again is called the ministry of the Spirit (2 Cor. 3:8). The promise of the Holy Spirit under the gospel is to all believers and not just to a special few (Rom. 8:9; John 14:16; Matt.28:20). We are taught to pray that God would give us his Holy Spirit, so that with his help we may live to God in the holy obedience he requires (Luke 11:9-13; Matt. 7;11; Eph. 1:17; 3:16; Col. 2:2; Rom. 8:26). The Holy Spirit was solemnly promised by Jesus Christ when he was about to leave the world (John 14:15-17; Heb. 9:15-17; 2 Cor. 1:22; John 14:27; 16:13). So the Holy Spirit is promised and given as the only cause of all the good that in this world we can partake of.
There is no good that we receive from God but it is brought to us and wrought in us by the Holy Spirit. Nor is there in us any good towards God, any faith, love, obedience to his will, but what we are enabled to do by the Holy Spirit. For in us, that is in our flesh, there is no good thing, as Paul tells us…The Holy Spirit’s work is to bring to completion what the Father had planned to do through his Son. By this, God is made know to us, and we are taught to trust in him. (p.19,21)
John Owen: what’s the big deal?
May 21, 2007
J.I. Packer wrote of John Owen,
In his own day he was seen as England’s foremost bastion and champion of Reformed evlangelical orthodoxy, and he did not doubt that God had given him this role; but his interest lay in broadening and deepening insight into the realities that orthodoxy confesses, and a humbled and humbling awareness that his present understanding, though true (so he believed) as far as it went, was deeply inadequate to those realities pervades all that he wrote. In this, as in most things, he was more like John Calvin than was any other of the Puritan leaders. (A Quest for Godliness, 81)
His main body of work was published in the 19th century as a 16-volume set (what might he have accomplished with a word processor?), plus a 7-volume commentary on Hebrews and a work on biblical theology which has only recently been translated from Latin to English. His work is not easy reading. If you studied Latin somewhere along the way you have an advantage in reading with understanding, as Owen’s style is Latinate. His writing is condensed and heavy. The trick I have learned is to read it aloud (at a whisper at least), and much of the difficulty fades.
You might expect a man of such depth and accomplishment to struggle with pride and vanity–and Owen apparently did. His enemies accused him of such. But time and again his writings reflect the kind of maturity that brings men low in their opinion of themselves before God. He wrote,
There are two things that are suited to humble the souls of men…a due consideration of God, and then of ourselves. Of God, in his greatness, glory, holiness, power, majesty and authority; of ourselves, in our mean, abject and sinful condition…the man that understands the evil of his own heart, how vile it is, is the only useful, fruitful and solidly believing and obedient person. [vi.200-201]

May, 2007: John Owen month
May 11, 2007
My scribes and archivists brought this to me from The Book of the Chronicles of the Pastors of the First Presbyterian Church of Kosciusko of Mississippi:
‘By all the executive powers invested in me as senior minister of the First Presbyterian Church of Kosciusko, Mississippi, and co-regent of the Sweet Dropper blog, I hereby declare the month of May, 2007, as “John Owen month.” So it is written; so let it be done.’
/s/ Phillip J. Palmertree, Tiller of Soils, Maker of 3-Pointers, and Drinker of the Chicory-Laced Coffee
So, I better start blogging about John Owen…John Owen (1616-1683) was by the consent of his contemporaries and generations that have followed, the weightiest and greatest of the English Puritan theologians. J.I. Packer provides this succinct summary of Owen’s life:
Born in 1616, he entered Queen’s College, Oxford, at the age of twelve and secured his M.A. in 1635, when he was nineteen. In his early twenties, conviction of sin threw him into such turmoil that for three months he could scarcely utter a coherent word on anything; but slowly he learned to trust Christ, and so found peace. In 1637 he became a pastor; in the 1640s he was chaplain to Oliver Cromwell, and in 1651 he was made Dean of Christ Church, Oxford’s largest college. In 1652 he was given the additional post of Vice-Chancellor of the University, which he then reorganized with conspicuous success. After 1660 he led the Independents through the bitter years of persecution till his death in 1683.
On a personal note, my introduction to Owen came while I was a student at Mississippi State University. One day in the MSU Bakery I had asked my RUF campus minister Hal Farnsworth what book he recommended on sanctification. He told me that the greatest work on sanctification had been written over 300 years ago by a man named John Owen, and that an English major like myself just might be able to tackle it. Thanks largely to the appeal to my vanity, I determined to read it…but I never did–at least until I was out of school and working as an RUF campus intern at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. Owen’s On the Mortification of Sin is indeed the greatest work on sanctification. I’ll say more about it in particular later in the month.
Since then, I was able to take a class on Owen under Sinclair Ferguson, do a directed study Th.M. class on Owen under Derek Thomas and do a lot of independent study and outlining of his voluminous works. This month Owen, and some new, interesting works about Owen that have recently been published, will be the matter for my blog entries. I’ll close out this one with Owen’s words and a photo of his grave.
Let our hearts admit, “I am poor and weak. Satan is too subtle, too cunning,
too powerful; he watches constantly for advantages over my soul. The world presses in upon me with all sorts of pressures, pleas, and pretences. My own corruption is violent, tumultuous, enticing, and entangling. As it conceives sin, it wars within me and against me. Occasions and opportunities for temptation are innumerable. No wonder I do not know how deeply involved I have been with sin. Therefore, on God alone will I rely for my keeping. I will continually look to him.

Tomb of Herod the Great found?
May 8, 2007
According to Haaretz.com, archaeologists from Hebrew University in Jerusalem have discovered the tomb site of Herod the Great–the Herod whom Rome allowed to ‘rule’ the province of Judaea from 74 BC to ~4 BC. This is the same Herod who appears in Matthew and Luke’s narratives of the birth of Jesus and instigator of the infant massacre at Bethlehem. Herod the Great is also famous for his ambitious expansion of the Temple in Jerusalem.
As for the tomb discovery, Professor Ehud Netzer has been digging since 1972 around a site known as Herodium, about 7 miles outside of Jerusalem and destroyed by the Romans in AD 71, acting on the belief that first-century Jewish historian Josephus was reliable in his detailed account of the funeral and burial of Herod. But it was not until this spring that his team found the ruins of a distinctively lavish (albeit empty) sarcophagus at Herodium.
Two additional interesting notes about Herod the Great:
- His ancestors were Edomites and not Jews. In his grandfather’s time, the Maccabeans conquered Idumea (home of the remnant of the Edomites) and compelled them to convert to Judaism. Although Herod surely would have seen himself as Jewish, conservative, observant Jews in his day would likely have viewed him as more Hellenistic than Jewish.
- You might scratch your head at the fact that Herod’s death is listed as ~4 BC. But wasn’t Jesus born in 1 AD? Not so fast, my friend. Our current numbering system for years was adopted in Western Europe in 8th century and was based on work by a 6th century monk named Dionysus Exiguus, who lived in Rome. Dionysus miscalculated a few things, and our best guesses are that Jesus was born between 6 BC and 4 BC.

Of such is the kingdom of heaven
May 4, 2007
What a lovely photo, taken 15 April when Emma Grace Johnson, daughter of Michael and Jan Johnson, was baptized into the most holy name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit! She was that happy even as the waters poured over her head. Why do we baptize the infant children of believers? Is it a vestige of mediaeval Roman Catholic practice that we Presbyterians never could shake? Below are links to three excellent articles from our friends at Third Millenium Ministries that address the issue of infant baptism.
- Infant Baptism: How My Mind Has Changed by Dr. Dennis E. Johnson (a letter to his college-age daughter who is interacting for the first time with fellow saints who deny that infant baptism is biblically sanctioned).
- A Conversation Concerning Infant Baptism by Jeff Rojan (an imaginary, but very real, conversation between a paedo-baptist and a credo-baptist).
- Jeremiah 31: Infant Baptism in the New Covenant by Dr. Richard Pratt (an exegetical study of the New Covenant prophecy in Jeremiah 31, which many credo-baptists use as a basis for rejecting infant baptism).

The Qur’an’s challenge to the Bible
May 3, 2007
My most recent conversation with a Muslim took place a couple of months ago in Trujillo, Peru. My companions and I were in a cab at the Plaza de Armas on a Saturday afternoon and noticed two bearded Middle Eastern men in turbans rolling out their prayer rugs amidst the crowds. This stood out in Trujillo like it would in Kosciusko. After getting something to eat, we walked over to where the men were sitting after they had finished their prayers. We engaged in some discussion in English with these men, who said they were from Pakistan. They were soft-spoken, charitable and most eager to talk about their faith. They emphasized Islam’s regard for Jesus as a prophet, implying that Muhammed reformed and revived and reoriented the path of true religion that Abraham, Moses and Jesus had advocated. By then a small crowd was gathering, along with a few nervous-looking police officers. As I was about to ask them if the Qur’an teaches that Jesus was crucified and resurrected (it denies this, by the way), a young Peruvian man asked them in English why Muslims crashed the planes into the World Trade Center–and you can guess that the conversation steered way off course from that point, and we decided to leave the crowd to their wrangling and the police to break it up.
Adam S. Francisco, assistant professor of history at Concordia College in Bronxville, New York, has written a short introduction to some of the striking differences between Christianity and Islam that may help you learn the lay of the land a bit. The piece originally appeared in the March/April 2007 issue of Modern Reformation.
